Adapted from: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicbiblio.html

Alter, C., & Egan, M. (1997). Logic modeling: A tool for teaching critical thinking in social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 33 (1).

Alter, C., & Murty, S. (1997). Logic modeling: A tool for teaching practice evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33 (1).

Anderson, A. (2000). Using theory of change in program planning and evaluation. Aspen Institute. PowerPoint presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Honolulu, HI.

Bennett, C. (1976). Analyzing impacts of extension programs, ESC-575. Washington, D.C.: Extension Service-U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Bennett, C., & Rockwell, K. (1995). Targeting outcomes of programs (TOP): An integrated approach to planning and evaluation. From: http://citnews.unl.edu/TOP/english/introduction.html

Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. In Bickman, L. (ed.). Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33: 5-18. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Carroll, J., & McKenna, J. (2001). Theory to practice: Using the logic model to organize and report research results in a collaborative program. Journal of Family and Consumer Science, 93 (4), 63-65.

Cato, B., Chen, W., & Corbett-Perez, S. (1998). Logic model: A tool for planning and evaluating health and recreation prevention projects. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69:8.

Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Chen, H, & Rossi, P. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7, 283-302.

Coffman, J. (1999). Learning from logic models: An example of a family/school partnership program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Curnan, S., & LaCava, L. (2000). Getting ready for outcome evaluation: Developing a logic model. Community Youth Development Journal, 16 (1), 8-9.

Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2000). Outcome mapping: Focussing monitoring & evaluation of development programs on changes in partners. From: http://www.idrc.ca/evaluation
/outcomemapping_short.htm

Flora, C. (1998). Performance based measurement and community building. Rural Development News, 22 (1).

Framst, G. (1995). Application of program logic model to agricultural technology transfer program. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 10 (2).

Freddolino, P., et al. (1998). It’s a great idea but…: Barriers to the use of program logic models in the real world of program activities. Okemos, MI: Michigan Public Health Institute.

Funnell, S. (1997). Program logic: An adaptable tool for designing and evaluating programs. Australia: Performance Improvement Poverty, Ltd.

Funnell, S. (2000). Developing and using a program theory matrix for program evaluation and performance monitoring. In P. Rogers, T. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, & T. Huebner (Eds.), Program Theory in

Hernandez, M. (2000). Using logic models and program theory to build outcome accountability. Education & Treatment of Children, 23 (1), 24-41.

Jordan, G. (1999). The state of the art of logic modeling: Expanding usefulness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando, FL.

Julian, D. (1997). The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20 (3), 251-257.

Julian, D., Jones, A., & Deyo, D. (1995). Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18 (4), 333-341.

Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic model development guide: Logic models to bring together planning, evaluation & action. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Kirkpatrick, S. (2001). The program logic model: What, why and how? From: http://www.charityvillage.com/charityvillage/research/rstrat3.html

Lambur, M., & Mayeske, G. (2000). Logic modeling: A process for enhancing program effects and evaluation results. Facilitator training manual. Crofton, MD: The Program Design Institute.

Mayeske, G. (1994). Life cycle program management and evaluation: An Heuristic approach, Part 1 of 2. Washington, D.C.: Extension Service, USDA.

Mayeske, G., & Lambur, M. (2001). How to design better programs: A staff-centered stakeholder approach to program logic modeling. Journal of Extension, 39 (3).

Mayeske, G., & Lambur, M. (2001). How to design better programs: A staff-centered stakeholder approach to program logic modeling. Crofton, MD: The Program Design Institute.

Mayne, J. (2001) Assessing Attribution Through Contribution Analysis: Using Performance Measures Sensibly, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16 (1), 1-24

McEwan, K., & Bigelow, D. (1997). Using a logic models to focus health services on population health goals. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 12, 167-174.

McLaughlin, J., & Jordan, G. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your program’s performance story. Evaluating and Program Planning, 22, 65-72.

Millar, A., Simeone, R., & Carnevale, J. (2001). Logic models: A systems tool for performance management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 73-81.

Montegue, Steve. (1998) Building Reach into Your Logic Model. Performance Management Network, www.pmn.net

Montegue, Steve. (2000). Circles of Influence: An Approach to Structured, succinct Strategy. Performance Management Network, www.pmn.net

Patton, M. (1997) Developing Program Theory. Evaluation News and Comment, July, 18-20

Pawson, R, & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Practical Concepts, Inc. (1971). The logical framework. Approach and training materials developed for U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington. D.C. Unpublished manuscript.

Rogers, P. (1998). Alternative causal models in program theory and evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago, IL.

Rogers, P. (2000). Causal models in program theory evaluation. In P. Rogers, T. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, & Huebner, T. (Eds), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities, New Directions in Program Evaluation, 87, 47-55. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Rogers, P., Hacsi, T., Petrosino, A., & Huebner, T. (Eds). (2000). Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions for Evaluation, 87. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Rush, B., & Ogborne, A. (1991). Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 6 (2).

Solem, R. (1987). The logical framework approach to project design, review and evaluation in A.I.D: Genesis, impact problems and opportunities. Washington, DC: USAID, Center for Development Information and Evaluation.